consumption: be good for economy

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.63 , activity Weight: 0.62 , disease Weight: 0.59 , production Weight: 0.58 , variable Weight: 0.58
Siblings	business activity Weight: 0.35 , sexual activity Weight: 0.34 , output Weight: 0.34 , demand Weight: 0.33 , spending Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good for economy	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(consumption, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(spending, be good for economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(consumption, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(spending, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(spending, be good for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(consumption, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(consumption, be good for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Salient(consumption, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(consumption, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(consumption, be good for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(consumption, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(consumption, be good for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(consumption, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)