contact: be good for 30 days

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents information
Weight: 0.62
, connection
Weight: 0.57
, option
Weight: 0.57
, function
Weight: 0.56
, benefit
Weight: 0.56
Siblings touch
Weight: 0.32
, link
Weight: 0.31
, telephone numbers
Weight: 0.31
, trace
Weight: 0.31
, computer database
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for 30 days 1.00
be good for 2 weeks 0.91
be good for month 0.89
come up as maybe 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(contact, be good for 30 days)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(contact, be good for 2 weeks)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(contact, be good for month)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(contact, be good for 2 weeks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(contact, be good for 2 weeks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(contact, be good for month)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(contact, be good for month)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(contact, come up as maybe)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(contact, come up as maybe)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(contact, come up as maybe)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(contact, be good for 2 weeks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(contact, be good for month)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(contact, come up as maybe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(contact, be good for 30 days)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(contact, be good for 30 days) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(contact, be good for 30 days)