container: be with lid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vessel
Weight: 0.62
, solution
Weight: 0.61
, receptacle
Weight: 0.60
, cargo
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cup
Weight: 0.69
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.68
, garbage can
Weight: 0.67
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.66
, mailbox
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with lid 1.00
hole on lid 0.92
be with lids 0.81
has physical part lids 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cup, hole on lid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cup, be with lids)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, be with lid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part lids)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(coffee cup, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, be with lid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cup, hole on lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cup, hole on lid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(coffee cup, has physical part lids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(coffee cup, has physical part lids)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cup, be with lids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cup, be with lids)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(container, be with lid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(container, be with lid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(container, be with lid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(coffee cup, be with lid)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cup, hole on lid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cup, be with lids)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(container, be with lid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(coffee cup, has physical part lids)