container: expand in refrigerator

Related concepts

Parents	vessel Weight: 0.62 , solution Weight: 0.61 , receptacle Weight: 0.60 , cargo Weight: 0.57
Siblings	cup Weight: 0.69 , wine bottle Weight: 0.68 , garbage can Weight: 0.67 , coffee cup Weight: 0.66 , mailbox Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
expand in refrigerator	1.00
be placed in freezer	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(container, expand in refrigerator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(cup, be placed in freezer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(container, expand in refrigerator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

Remarkable(cup, be placed in freezer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(cup, be placed in freezer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(container, expand in refrigerator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(container, expand in refrigerator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Salient(container, expand in refrigerator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(container, expand in refrigerator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(container, expand in refrigerator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(container, expand in refrigerator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(container, expand in refrigerator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(container, expand in refrigerator) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(cup, be placed in freezer)