container: have involuted base

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vessel
Weight: 0.62
, solution
Weight: 0.61
, receptacle
Weight: 0.60
, cargo
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cup
Weight: 0.69
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.68
, garbage can
Weight: 0.67
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.66
, mailbox
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have base 1.00
have involuted base 1.00
be made with top wider than base 0.83
have indent in base 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, be made with top wider than base)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wine bottle, have indent in base)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(wine bottle, have indent in base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wine bottle, have indent in base)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cup, be made with top wider than base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cup, be made with top wider than base)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(container, have involuted base)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(container, have base)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(container, have base)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(container, have base)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(container, have base)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(container, have involuted base)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(container, have involuted base)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cup, be made with top wider than base)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(container, have involuted base) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wine bottle, have indent in base)