container: is more efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vessel
Weight: 0.62
, solution
Weight: 0.61
, receptacle
Weight: 0.60
, cargo
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cup
Weight: 0.69
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.68
, garbage can
Weight: 0.67
, coffee cup
Weight: 0.66
, mailbox
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more efficient 1.00
be more efficient than tracheids 0.98
is efficient 0.97
is faster 0.76
is expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vessel, be more efficient than tracheids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(container, is more efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(vessel, be more efficient than tracheids)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(vessel, be more efficient than tracheids)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mailbox, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(vessel, be more efficient than tracheids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(container, is more efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mailbox, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(mailbox, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(container, is more efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(container, is efficient)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(container, is efficient)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(container, is faster)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(container, is efficient)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(container, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(container, is efficient)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(container, is faster)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(container, is faster)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(container, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(container, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(container, is faster)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(container, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(container, is more efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(container, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(vessel, be more efficient than tracheids)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mailbox, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(container, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(vessel, be more efficient than tracheids)