contestant: wear clothes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents judge
Weight: 0.53
, talent
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, person
Weight: 0.50
Siblings one person
Weight: 0.32
, homeless person
Weight: 0.31
, first lady
Weight: 0.31
, old lady
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear clothes 1.00
wear same clothes 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(judge, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(contestant, wear clothes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(judge, wear clothes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, wear clothes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(judge, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(contestant, wear clothes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(contestant, wear clothes)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(contestant, wear same clothes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(contestant, wear same clothes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(contestant, wear same clothes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(contestant, wear same clothes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contestant, wear clothes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(contestant, wear clothes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(judge, wear clothes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(contestant, wear clothes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(judge, wear clothes)