context: be important in architecture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dimension
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.63
, discussion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings prefix
Weight: 0.48
, element
Weight: 0.34
, aspect
Weight: 0.34
, picture frame
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in architecture 1.00
be important in art 0.77
selecting principles for interface design 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(element, be important in art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(element, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(element, be important in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(context, be important in architecture)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(context, be important in art)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(context, selecting principles for interface design)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(context, selecting principles for interface design)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(context, be important in art)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(context, selecting principles for interface design)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(context, be important in art)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(context, selecting principles for interface design)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in architecture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(context, be important in architecture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(context, be important in architecture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(element, be important in art)