contract: be in game

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, record
Weight: 0.61
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lease
Weight: 0.67
, deal
Weight: 0.59
, delivery
Weight: 0.59
, future
Weight: 0.58
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in game 1.00
be with play 0.84
match body 0.78
being played 0.77
be for player 1 year 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(record, be with play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(contract, be in game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(record, be with play)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(record, be with play)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(record, be with play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contract, be in game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(contract, be in game)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(contract, be for player 1 year)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(contract, be for player 1 year)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(contract, be for player 1 year)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(contract, be for player 1 year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(contract, be in game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(contract, be in game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(record, be with play)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(contract, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(record, be with play)