contract: work in terms of pay

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, record
Weight: 0.61
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings lease
Weight: 0.67
, deal
Weight: 0.59
, delivery
Weight: 0.59
, future
Weight: 0.58
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
work in terms of pay 1.00
work in terms 0.93
work with massdrop 0.79
is work 0.78
work 0.77
require down payment 0.77
require payment 0.76
be good company work for 0.76
work at all 0.76
be imposed in insurance contract 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(loan, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(contract, work in terms of pay)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(warranty, be imposed in insurance contract) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(contract, work in terms of pay)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(warranty, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(contract, work in terms of pay)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(loan, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(contract, work in terms of pay)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(loan, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(contract, work in terms of pay)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(warranty, work with massdrop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(contract, work in terms of pay)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(warranty, work with massdrop)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(loan, is work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(loan, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(warranty, work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(warranty, be imposed in insurance contract)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(loan, be good company work for)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(warranty, work with massdrop)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(warranty, be imposed in insurance contract)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(warranty, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(loan, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(loan, be good company work for)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, is work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(future, work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(lease, require down payment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lease, require payment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(delivery, work)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lease, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(warranty, work with massdrop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(loan, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(loan, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(warranty, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(loan, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(warranty, be imposed in insurance contract) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lease, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lease, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(delivery, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(delivery, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(lease, require payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lease, require payment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(lease, require down payment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(lease, require down payment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(future, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(future, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(contract, work in terms of pay)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(contract, is work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(contract, is work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(contract, work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(contract, work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(contract, work at all)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(contract, is work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(contract, work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(contract, is work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(contract, work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(contract, work at all)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(contract, work at all)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(contract, work at all)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(contract, work in terms of pay)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(loan, is work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(loan, work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(warranty, work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(warranty, work with massdrop)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work for)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(warranty, be imposed in insurance contract)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(lease, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(delivery, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(lease, require payment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(future, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lease, require down payment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(loan, is work)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(loan, work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(warranty, work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(warranty, work with massdrop)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(loan, be good company work for)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(contract, work in terms of pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(warranty, be imposed in insurance contract)