contraction: be used in situations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings peristalsis
Weight: 0.41
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, growth
Weight: 0.32
, drop
Weight: 0.32
, decrease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in situations 1.00
be used in certain situations 0.97
be used 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(contraction, be used in situations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(factor, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be used)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(contraction, be used in situations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(contraction, be used in situations)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be used in certain situations)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(contraction, be used in certain situations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(contraction, be used in certain situations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(contraction, be used in certain situations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be used in situations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(contraction, be used in situations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be used)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(contraction, be used in situations)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be used)