contraction: be used in writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings peristalsis
Weight: 0.41
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, growth
Weight: 0.32
, drop
Weight: 0.32
, decrease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in writing 1.00
be allowed in writing 0.91
be used in formal writing 0.87
be allowed in formal writing 0.82
was written 0.81
be used 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be used)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(contraction, be used in writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(factor, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drop, was written)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be used)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(contraction, be used in writing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(drop, was written)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(drop, was written)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(contraction, be used in writing)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(contraction, be used in formal writing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be used in formal writing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(contraction, be used in formal writing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be allowed in formal writing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(contraction, be allowed in formal writing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be allowed in writing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(contraction, be used in formal writing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(contraction, be allowed in formal writing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(contraction, be allowed in writing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(contraction, be allowed in writing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(contraction, be allowed in formal writing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contraction, be allowed in writing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be used in writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(contraction, be used in writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(drop, was written)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(contraction, be used in writing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be used)