contraction: differ from change in state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings peristalsis
Weight: 0.41
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, growth
Weight: 0.32
, drop
Weight: 0.32
, decrease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
differ from change in state 1.00
differ from change 0.98
differ from change in state of matter 0.97
differ in bjt 0.92
differ from development 0.89
differ around world 0.88
differ from growth 0.86
differ from factor 0.86
affect change 0.85
differ from growth of living things 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(concept, differ around world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraction, differ from change in state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(concept, differ in bjt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraction, differ from change in state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, differ from factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraction, differ from change in state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, differ from factor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(concept, differ in bjt)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(concept, differ around world)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(concept, differ around world)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(concept, differ in bjt)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(factor, differ from factor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(growth, differ from development)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(growth, differ from growth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(growth, differ from growth of living things)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(concept, differ in bjt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(concept, differ around world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, differ from factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(growth, differ from development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(growth, differ from development)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(growth, differ from growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(growth, differ from growth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(growth, differ from growth of living things) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(growth, differ from growth of living things)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(contraction, differ from change in state)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(contraction, differ from change in state of matter)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(contraction, differ from change)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state of matter)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(contraction, differ from change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(contraction, differ from change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(contraction, differ from change in state of matter)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state of matter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(contraction, differ from change in state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, differ from factor)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(concept, differ in bjt)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(concept, differ around world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(growth, differ from development)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(growth, differ from growth)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(growth, differ from growth of living things)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, differ from factor)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(concept, differ in bjt)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(contraction, differ from change in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(concept, differ around world)