contraction: has quality worse

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings peristalsis
Weight: 0.41
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, growth
Weight: 0.32
, drop
Weight: 0.32
, decrease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worse 1.00
get worse 0.90
has quality bad 0.87
be worse at night 0.84
has quality good 0.84
be worse after water breaks 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decline, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(growth, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(growth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(growth, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(decline, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(decline, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(contraction, has quality worse)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(contraction, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(contraction, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(contraction, get worse)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(contraction, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(contraction, get worse)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(contraction, get worse)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(contraction, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be worse at night)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(contraction, be worse after water breaks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(contraction, get worse)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(contraction, be worse at night)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(contraction, be worse at night)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(contraction, be worse after water breaks)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(contraction, be worse after water breaks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(contraction, be worse at night)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(contraction, be worse after water breaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(contraction, has quality worse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(contraction, has quality worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(growth, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(contraction, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(decline, has quality bad)