contraction: help in digestion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.55
, concept
Weight: 0.52
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings peristalsis
Weight: 0.41
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, growth
Weight: 0.32
, drop
Weight: 0.32
, decrease
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
help in digestion 1.00
be important in digestion 0.97
be important in digestive system 0.84
be important to digestive tract 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(peristalsis, be important in digestion)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(peristalsis, be important in digestive system)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(peristalsis, be important to digestive tract)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(peristalsis, be important in digestion)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(peristalsis, be important in digestion)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(peristalsis, be important in digestive system)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(peristalsis, be important in digestive system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(peristalsis, be important to digestive tract)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(peristalsis, be important to digestive tract)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(contraction, help in digestion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(contraction, help in digestion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(contraction, help in digestion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(peristalsis, be important in digestion)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(peristalsis, be important in digestive system)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(contraction, help in digestion)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(peristalsis, be important to digestive tract)