contractor: have bad reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction worker
Weight: 0.70
, workman
Weight: 0.63
, professional
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.61
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, engineer
Weight: 0.65
, builder
Weight: 0.63
, plumber
Weight: 0.63
, agent
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad reputation 1.00
have reputation 0.97
has quality bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(contractor, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(contractor, have reputation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(contractor, have reputation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(contractor, have reputation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(contractor, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(contractor, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contractor, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(contractor, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(contractor, have reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(contractor, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(contractor, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(contractor, have bad reputation)