control: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pressure
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.58
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings remote control
Weight: 0.80
, balance
Weight: 0.62
, thermostat
Weight: 0.60
, gas pedal
Weight: 0.57
, gain
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(control, has quality system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(thermostat, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(gas pedal, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(technology, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(control, has quality system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(thermostat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(thermostat, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gas pedal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gas pedal, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(control, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(control, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(control, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(control, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(control, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(thermostat, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(gas pedal, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(control, has quality system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(technology, has quality bad)