convenience store: have locks on doors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.86
, food store
Weight: 0.82
, location
Weight: 0.77
, store
Weight: 0.67
Siblings hardware store
Weight: 0.77
, gas station
Weight: 0.72
, supermarket
Weight: 0.71
, shopping center
Weight: 0.70
, grocery
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have locks on doors 1.00
have locks 0.93
lock bathrooms 0.81
lock one side 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, have locks on doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(gas station, lock bathrooms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(convenience store, have locks on doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(gas station, lock bathrooms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(gas station, lock bathrooms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(convenience store, have locks on doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(convenience store, have locks on doors)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(convenience store, have locks on doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(convenience store, have locks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(convenience store, have locks on doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(convenience store, have locks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(convenience store, have locks on doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(convenience store, have locks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(convenience store, have locks on doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, have locks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(convenience store, have locks on doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(convenience store, have locks on doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, have locks on doors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(convenience store, have locks on doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(convenience store, have locks on doors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, have locks on doors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(gas station, lock bathrooms)