conversation: be at internet cafe

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fact
Weight: 0.61
, article
Weight: 0.61
, thread
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chat
Weight: 0.63
, news article
Weight: 0.34
, story
Weight: 0.32
, obituary
Weight: 0.32
, pager
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at internet cafe 1.00
be at magazine in internet site 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(article, be at magazine in internet site)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(conversation, be at internet cafe)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conversation, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(article, be at magazine in internet site)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(article, be at magazine in internet site)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(article, be at magazine in internet site)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(conversation, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(conversation, be at internet cafe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conversation, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(conversation, be at internet cafe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(conversation, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(conversation, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be at internet cafe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(conversation, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(conversation, be at internet cafe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(article, be at magazine in internet site)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(conversation, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(article, be at magazine in internet site)