conversation: be considered scientific law

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents exchange
Weight: 0.62
, fact
Weight: 0.61
, article
Weight: 0.61
, thread
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chat
Weight: 0.63
, dialogue
Weight: 0.59
, tweet
Weight: 0.56
, session
Weight: 0.56
, news article
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered scientific law 1.00
be considered law 0.88
be in scientific journals 0.81
be in science 0.80
be important in science 0.80
be important to science 0.80
be in science change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(article, be in scientific journals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fact, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(fact, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fact, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fact, be in science change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fact, be in science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fact, be in science change)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fact, be important to science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fact, be important in science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(article, be in scientific journals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(fact, be in science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fact, be important to science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(article, be in scientific journals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fact, be important in science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fact, be in science change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(article, be in scientific journals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fact, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(fact, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(fact, be in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fact, be in science change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(conversation, be considered scientific law)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(conversation, be considered law)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered law)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(conversation, be considered law)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(conversation, be considered law)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(article, be in scientific journals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fact, be in science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fact, be important to science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fact, be important in science)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fact, be in science change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(article, be in scientific journals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fact, be in science)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fact, be important to science)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fact, be important in science)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(conversation, be considered scientific law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fact, be in science change)