convict: get last meal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.54
, prisoner
Weight: 0.48
, term
Weight: 0.48
, favorite
Weight: 0.45
, record
Weight: 0.41
Siblings murderer
Weight: 0.33
, defendant
Weight: 0.33
, criminal
Weight: 0.32
, homeless person
Weight: 0.32
, juror
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
get last meal 1.00
get meal 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(criminal, get last meal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(murderer, get last meal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(murderer, get meal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(criminal, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(criminal, get last meal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(murderer, get meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(murderer, get meal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(murderer, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(murderer, get last meal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(convict, get last meal)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(convict, get meal)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(convict, get meal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(convict, get meal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(convict, get meal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(convict, get last meal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(convict, get last meal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(criminal, get last meal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(murderer, get meal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(convict, get last meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(murderer, get last meal)