cook: be used to chef

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.61
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.56
Siblings kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.33
, baker
Weight: 0.33
, dish
Weight: 0.33
, gardener
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to chef 1.00
be at restaurant 0.77
be at kitchen 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dish, be at kitchen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(dish, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dish, be at kitchen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cook, be used to chef)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(cook, be at restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cook, be at restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cook, be at kitchen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cook, be at kitchen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cook, be at restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cook, be at kitchen)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cook, be at kitchen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cook, be at restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cook, be used to chef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cook, be used to chef)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cook, be used to chef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(dish, be at kitchen)