cook: good food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.61
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chef
Weight: 0.57
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.33
, baker
Weight: 0.33
, dish
Weight: 0.33
, gardener
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
good food 1.00
be used to make good food 0.95
requires food 0.89
be used to make food 0.89
be used to make food taste good 0.88
requires have food 0.88
causes you eat healthy food 0.87
be used to make food to eat 0.87
causes food 0.87
causes have food to eat 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(kitchen utensil, be used to make food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(kitchen utensil, be used to make food)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(kitchen utensil, be used to make food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cook, good food)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cook, be used to make good food)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cook, good food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cook, be used to make good food)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cook, be used to make good food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cook, be used to make good food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, requires food)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cook, good food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cook, requires food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cook, requires food)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(cook, be used to make food to eat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, causes you eat healthy food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cook, good food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cook, causes you eat healthy food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cook, good food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cook, be used to make food to eat)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cook, causes you eat healthy food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cook, be used to make food to eat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cook, requires food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(cook, causes you eat healthy food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(cook, be used to make food to eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cook, good food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cook, good food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(cook, good food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(kitchen utensil, be used to make food)