cook: smoke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.61
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, man
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chef
Weight: 0.57
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.34
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
smoke 1.00
tend smoke 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(chef, smoke)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(chef, tend smoke)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(chef, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(chef, smoke)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(chef, tend smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chef, tend smoke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(cook, smoke)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cook, tend smoke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(cook, tend smoke)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cook, tend smoke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(cook, tend smoke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cook, smoke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cook, smoke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chef, smoke)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cook, smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chef, tend smoke)