cooked food: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
go bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cooked food, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(cooked food, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(cooked food, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, go bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(cooked food, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(cooked food, go bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(cooked food, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cooked food, go bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cooked food, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(cooked food, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(cooked food, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cooked food, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(cooked food, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cooked food, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(cooked food, be bad for dogs)