cooking utensil: has state repair

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.76
, frying pan
Weight: 0.75
, item
Weight: 0.68
, necessity
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.63
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.78
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.76
, spoon
Weight: 0.70
, wok
Weight: 0.65
, coffee maker
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state repair 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(utensil, has state repair)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has state repair)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cooking utensil, has state repair)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(utensil, has state repair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has state repair)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has state repair)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(utensil, has state repair)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cooking utensil, has state repair)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has state repair)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cooking utensil, has state repair)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(cooking utensil, has state repair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(cooking utensil, has state repair)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has state repair)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has state repair)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(cooking utensil, has state repair)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has state repair)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has state repair)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(utensil, has state repair)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(cooking utensil, has state repair)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(utensil, has state repair)