cooking: be in aluminum

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.65
, craft
Weight: 0.62
, art
Weight: 0.61
, method
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings frying
Weight: 0.44
, baking
Weight: 0.36
, woodworking
Weight: 0.35
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, quilting
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in aluminum 1.00
be in aluminum foil 0.90
be with aluminum foil 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cooking, be in aluminum)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cooking, be with aluminum foil)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cooking, be in aluminum foil)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(cooking, be with aluminum foil)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cooking, be in aluminum foil)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be with aluminum foil)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be in aluminum foil)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cooking, be with aluminum foil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cooking, be in aluminum foil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be in aluminum)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cooking, be in aluminum)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cooking, be in aluminum)