copperhead: be bad year 2017

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snake
Weight: 0.69
, species
Weight: 0.52
, reptile
Weight: 0.51
, course
Weight: 0.43
, term
Weight: 0.35
Siblings rattlesnake
Weight: 0.39
, boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, python
Weight: 0.36
, bobcat
Weight: 0.35
, alligator
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad year 1.00
be bad year 2017 1.00
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(course, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(copperhead, be bad year 2017)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(course, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(python, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bobcat, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(course, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(copperhead, be bad year 2017)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(bobcat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(bobcat, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(python, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(python, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(copperhead, be bad year 2017)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(copperhead, be bad year)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(copperhead, be bad year)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(copperhead, be bad year)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(copperhead, be bad year)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(copperhead, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(copperhead, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(copperhead, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(copperhead, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(copperhead, be bad year 2017)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(copperhead, be bad year 2017)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(course, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bobcat, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(python, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(copperhead, be bad year 2017) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(course, has quality bad)