cord: be enlarged in two regions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wire
Weight: 0.60
, car
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, accessory
Weight: 0.55
Siblings extension cord
Weight: 0.82
, shoelace
Weight: 0.46
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.33
, lanyard
Weight: 0.33
, duct tape
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be enlarged in two regions 1.00
be enlarged in cervical 0.77
be enlarged in lumbar 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(cord, be enlarged in two regions)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cord, be enlarged in lumbar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(cord, be enlarged in lumbar)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cord, be enlarged in cervical)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cord, be enlarged in cervical)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cord, be enlarged in lumbar)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cord, be enlarged in cervical)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cord, be enlarged in cervical)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cord, be enlarged in lumbar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cord, be enlarged in two regions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cord, be enlarged in two regions)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cord, be enlarged in two regions)