corn: be good for cattle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents starch
Weight: 0.69
, grain
Weight: 0.67
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.67
, staple
Weight: 0.66
, vegetable
Weight: 0.66
Siblings wheat
Weight: 0.39
, soybean
Weight: 0.38
, barley
Weight: 0.38
, oat
Weight: 0.38
, wheat flour
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for cattle 1.00
be bad for cows 0.89
be good for hogs 0.87
be bad for guniea pigs 0.83
be bad for horses in winter 0.80
be considered grain 0.76
be more popular than barley 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(grain, be bad for cows)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(corn, be good for cattle)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(grain, be bad for cows)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(grain, be bad for cows)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wheat, be more popular than barley)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(barley, be considered grain)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(grain, be bad for cows)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(corn, be good for cattle)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(barley, be considered grain)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(barley, be considered grain)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(wheat, be more popular than barley)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wheat, be more popular than barley)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(corn, be good for cattle)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(corn, be bad for guniea pigs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(corn, be bad for guniea pigs)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(corn, be bad for guniea pigs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(corn, be good for hogs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(corn, be bad for guniea pigs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(corn, be bad for horses in winter)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(corn, be good for hogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(corn, be good for hogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(corn, be bad for horses in winter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(corn, be bad for horses in winter)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(corn, be considered grain)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(corn, be bad for horses in winter)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(corn, be considered grain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(corn, be considered grain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(corn, be good for hogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(corn, be considered grain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(corn, be good for cattle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(grain, be bad for cows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(barley, be considered grain)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(wheat, be more popular than barley)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(corn, be good for cattle)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(grain, be bad for cows)