cornea: be good transplanting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.62
, body part
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.52
, organ
Weight: 0.50
Siblings sclera
Weight: 0.40
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.37
, vascular tissue
Weight: 0.35
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.35
, skin
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good transplanting 1.00
be transplanted 0.83
be transplanted from person 0.82
CAN can transplanted 0.80
be transplanted without rejection 0.80
CAN can transplanted without tissue rejection 0.80
be easy to transplant 0.79
be transplanted from person to person 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bone marrow, be transplanted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(bone marrow, be transplanted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(bone marrow, be transplanted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(cornea, be good transplanting)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cornea, CAN can transplanted)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cornea, be transplanted)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cornea, CAN can transplanted)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cornea, be transplanted)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(cornea, CAN can transplanted)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cornea, be good transplanting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cornea, be good transplanting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cornea, be good transplanting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(bone marrow, be transplanted)