corporation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.69
, system
Weight: 0.67
, enterprise
Weight: 0.65
, employer
Weight: 0.64
Siblings joint stock company
Weight: 0.67
, oil company
Weight: 0.65
, american express
Weight: 0.63
, chrysler
Weight: 0.62
, ibm
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(chrysler, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(chrysler, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(chrysler, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(oil company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(oil company, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(corporation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(corporation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(corporation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(chrysler, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(corporation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(oil company, has quality bad)