corruption: be low in denmark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be low in denmark 1.00
be low in japan 0.83
be in japan low 0.83
be low in singapore 0.81
be high in australia 0.81
be in kerala low 0.80
be in usa lower than in china 0.78
be high in london 0.77
be in brazil high 0.77
be high in brazil 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(crime, be low in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(corruption, be low in denmark)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(crime, be low in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(corruption, be low in denmark)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crime, be high in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(corruption, be low in denmark)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crime, be high in brazil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(corruption, be low in denmark)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(crime, be low in singapore)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(crime, be low in japan)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in brazil)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(crime, be low in japan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(crime, be low in singapore)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in london)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in brazil)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(crime, be low in japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(crime, be low in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crime, be high in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crime, be high in brazil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(corruption, be low in denmark)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in usa lower than in china)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(corruption, be in usa lower than in china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(corruption, be in usa lower than in china)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in kerala low)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(corruption, be in kerala low)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in kerala low)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in usa lower than in china)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(corruption, be in kerala low)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(corruption, be low in denmark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(crime, be low in japan)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(crime, be low in singapore)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in london)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in brazil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(crime, be low in singapore)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(crime, be low in japan)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in brazil)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(corruption, be low in denmark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in london)