corruption: be prevalent in organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prevalent in organization 1.00
be prevalent in large organization 0.96
be prevalent in soccer organizations 0.87
be prevalent in uk 0.80
be prevalent in europe 0.80
be prevalent in downtown 0.79
be in dreams prevalent 0.79
be prevalent in france 0.79
be prevalent in every downtown 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(theme, be in dreams prevalent)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(corruption, be prevalent in organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(theme, be in dreams prevalent)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(theme, be in dreams prevalent)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in france)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(theme, be in dreams prevalent)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(corruption, be prevalent in organization)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in france)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in france)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(corruption, be prevalent in organization)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in soccer organizations)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(corruption, be prevalent in soccer organizations)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(corruption, be prevalent in soccer organizations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(corruption, be prevalent in large organization)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(corruption, be prevalent in large organization)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(corruption, be prevalent in soccer organizations)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in large organization)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(corruption, be prevalent in large organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(corruption, be prevalent in organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(theme, be in dreams prevalent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in france)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(corruption, be prevalent in organization)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(theme, be in dreams prevalent)