corruption: work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
work 1.00
work together increase 0.78
work with movies 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(corruption, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(factor, work together increase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(corruption, work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(theme, work with movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(corruption, work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(theme, work with movies)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(factor, work together increase)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(theme, work with movies)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, work together increase)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(terrorism, work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bribery, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(corruption, work)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(factor, work together increase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(corruption, work)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(theme, work with movies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(corruption, work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(bribery, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(bribery, work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(terrorism, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(terrorism, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(corruption, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(corruption, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(theme, work with movies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bribery, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(terrorism, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(factor, work together increase)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(corruption, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(theme, work with movies)