cost: be with insurance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with insurance 1.00
work with insurance 0.97
work in insurance 0.97
be used in insurance 0.96
work for health insurance 0.94
is u insurance 0.87
is u less insurance 0.85
be in cargo insurance 0.83
be in marine cargo insurance 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deductible, work in insurance)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(deductible, work with insurance)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(deductible, work for health insurance)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(deductible, be in marine cargo insurance)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deductible, be used in insurance)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deductible, be in cargo insurance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(deductible, be used in insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(deductible, be used in insurance)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(deductible, work with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(deductible, work with insurance)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(deductible, work in insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(deductible, work in insurance)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(deductible, be in cargo insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(deductible, be in cargo insurance)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(deductible, work for health insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(deductible, work for health insurance)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(deductible, be in marine cargo insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(deductible, be in marine cargo insurance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cost, be with insurance)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cost, is u less insurance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cost, is u less insurance)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cost, is u less insurance)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cost, is u less insurance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cost, be with insurance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(deductible, work with insurance)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(deductible, be used in insurance)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(deductible, be in cargo insurance)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(deductible, work in insurance)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(deductible, work for health insurance)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cost, be with insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(deductible, be in marine cargo insurance)