cost: more than nsmbu

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
more than nsmbu 1.00
is more expensive 0.84
be more relevant than costs 0.80
more than local calls 0.80
more than tvs 0.76
be more relevant than costs in short-term decision making 0.76
be more relevant than costs in decision making 0.76
be more relevant than fixed costs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tuition, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tuition, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(tuition, is more expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(cost, more than nsmbu)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(cost, more than local calls)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(cost, more than tvs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(cost, more than tvs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(cost, more than tvs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cost, more than local calls)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cost, more than tvs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(cost, more than local calls)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cost, more than local calls)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cost, more than nsmbu)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, more than nsmbu)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cost, more than nsmbu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tuition, is more expensive)