cotton: be at texas

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents textile
Weight: 0.69
, seed
Weight: 0.66
, raw material
Weight: 0.65
, fabric
Weight: 0.65
Siblings flannel
Weight: 0.48
, silk
Weight: 0.36
, wool
Weight: 0.36
, grain
Weight: 0.35
, wheat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at texas 1.00
be at georgia 0.83
be at north carolina 0.76
be at japan 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silk, be at japan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silk, be at japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(silk, be at japan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(cotton, be at texas)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cotton, be at georgia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(cotton, be at north carolina)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cotton, be at georgia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cotton, be at north carolina)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cotton, be at north carolina)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be at north carolina)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be at georgia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cotton, be at georgia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be at texas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cotton, be at texas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be at texas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(silk, be at japan)