:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(silk, be soft)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(silk, feel soft)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cotton, be soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(silk, be soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(silk, be soft)
Salient implies Plausible
0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cotton, be soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cotton, be soft)
Similarity expansion
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cotton, be soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(cotton, feel soft)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cotton, be soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cotton, feel soft)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cotton, be soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cotton, be soft)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(silk, be soft)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be soft)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(silk, feel soft)