coupe: cost insure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents car
Weight: 0.59
, model
Weight: 0.54
, type
Weight: 0.48
, convertible
Weight: 0.47
Siblings roadster
Weight: 0.37
, buick
Weight: 0.35
, porsche
Weight: 0.34
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.34
, volvo
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost insure 1.00
cost more 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(convertible, cost more)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(coupe, cost insure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(convertible, cost more)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(convertible, cost more)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(convertible, cost more)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(coupe, cost insure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(coupe, cost insure)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(coupe, cost more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(coupe, cost more)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(coupe, cost more)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(coupe, cost more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coupe, cost insure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(coupe, cost insure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(convertible, cost more)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(coupe, cost insure)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(convertible, cost more)