couple: have joint facebook accounts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pair
Weight: 0.60
, kid
Weight: 0.60
, many people
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings married couple
Weight: 0.81
, brad
Weight: 0.49
, other people
Weight: 0.33
, most people
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have joint facebook accounts 1.00
have joint bank accounts 0.87
have separate bank accounts 0.81
overshare on facebook 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(married couple, have separate bank accounts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(married couple, have separate bank accounts)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(married couple, have separate bank accounts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(couple, have joint facebook accounts)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(couple, have joint bank accounts)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(couple, have joint bank accounts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(couple, have joint bank accounts)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(couple, have separate bank accounts)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(couple, have separate bank accounts)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(couple, have separate bank accounts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(couple, have joint bank accounts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(couple, have separate bank accounts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(couple, have joint facebook accounts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(couple, have joint facebook accounts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(couple, have joint facebook accounts)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(married couple, have separate bank accounts)