court case: is record

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents matter
Weight: 0.73
, issue
Weight: 0.68
, case
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.65
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.83
, divorce
Weight: 0.64
, court
Weight: 0.63
, bankruptcy
Weight: 0.62
, tribunal
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
is record 1.00
is public record 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bankruptcy, is record)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(divorce, is public record)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bankruptcy, is public record)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(divorce, is public record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(divorce, is public record)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bankruptcy, is public record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(bankruptcy, is public record)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bankruptcy, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(bankruptcy, is record)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(court case, is record)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(court case, is public record)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(court case, is public record)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(court case, is public record)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(court case, is public record)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(court case, is record)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(court case, is record)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bankruptcy, is record)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(divorce, is public record)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(court case, is record) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bankruptcy, is public record)