court: challenge actions of executive agencies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis court
Weight: 0.75
, tribunal
Weight: 0.69
, school
Weight: 0.64
, court case
Weight: 0.63
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.73
, basketball court
Weight: 0.64
, grand jury
Weight: 0.62
, justice
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
challenge actions of executive agencies 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(court, challenge actions of executive agencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, challenge actions of executive agencies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(court, challenge actions of executive agencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(supreme court, challenge actions of executive agencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(supreme court, challenge actions of executive agencies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(court, challenge actions of executive agencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(court, challenge actions of executive agencies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(court, challenge actions of executive agencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(court, challenge actions of executive agencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(court, challenge actions of executive agencies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(court, challenge actions of executive agencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(court, challenge actions of executive agencies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(court, challenge actions of executive agencies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(supreme court, challenge actions of executive agencies)