court: were created

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis court
Weight: 0.75
, tribunal
Weight: 0.69
, school
Weight: 0.64
, court case
Weight: 0.63
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.73
, basketball court
Weight: 0.64
, grand jury
Weight: 0.62
, justice
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
were created 1.00
be created 0.94
is created 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tribunal, is created)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(court, were created)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tribunal, is created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(tribunal, is created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tribunal, is created)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(court, were created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(court, were created)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(court, is created)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(court, be created)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(court, be created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(court, be created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(court, is created)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(court, be created)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(court, is created)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(court, is created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(court, were created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(court, were created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tribunal, is created)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(court, were created)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(tribunal, is created)