cover: be at kitchen

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents detail
Weight: 0.64
, part
Weight: 0.60
, work
Weight: 0.60
, hit
Weight: 0.59
, publication
Weight: 0.58
Siblings shield
Weight: 0.32
, magazine
Weight: 0.31
, periodical
Weight: 0.31
, illustration
Weight: 0.31
, cap
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at kitchen 1.00
be at bedroom 0.79
be at room 0.77
be at garage 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(magazine, be at bedroom)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(magazine, be at bedroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(magazine, be at bedroom)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cover, be at kitchen)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(cover, be at room)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cover, be at garage)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(cover, be at garage)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(cover, be at garage)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cover, be at room)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cover, be at garage)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cover, be at room)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cover, be at room)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cover, be at kitchen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cover, be at kitchen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cover, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(magazine, be at bedroom)