cover: be viable run defenses

Related concepts

Parents	detail Weight: 0.64 , part Weight: 0.60 , work Weight: 0.60 , hit Weight: 0.59 , factor Weight: 0.59
Siblings	coverage Weight: 0.32 , pay Weight: 0.32 , shield Weight: 0.32 , but Weight: 0.31 , social security number Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be viable run defenses	1.00
be run defenses	0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(cover, be viable run defenses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(cover, be viable run defenses)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.38

Typical(cover, be viable run defenses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(cover, be run defenses)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(cover, be viable run defenses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(cover, be run defenses)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(cover, be viable run defenses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(cover, be run defenses)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(cover, be viable run defenses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(cover, be run defenses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Salient(cover, be viable run defenses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(cover, be viable run defenses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(cover, be viable run defenses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(cover, be viable run defenses) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(cover, be viable run defenses)