coverage: be in rapids

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, system
Weight: 0.54
, practice
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cover
Weight: 0.32
, reporting
Weight: 0.31
, preview
Weight: 0.31
, medicare
Weight: 0.31
, programming language
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rapids 1.00
be in grand rapids 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(coverage, be in rapids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(coverage, be in rapids)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(coverage, be in rapids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in grand rapids)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(coverage, be in rapids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(coverage, be in grand rapids)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(coverage, be in rapids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(coverage, be in grand rapids)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(coverage, be in rapids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in grand rapids)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(coverage, be in rapids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(coverage, be in rapids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in rapids)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(coverage, be in rapids) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(coverage, be in rapids)