cpu: be at 100

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, parameter
Weight: 0.62
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, chip
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
Siblings motherboard
Weight: 0.35
, filename
Weight: 0.34
, server
Weight: 0.34
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.34
, processor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at 100 1.00
be at 100 time 0.89
run at 100 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(processor, run at 100)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(processor, run at 100)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(processor, run at 100)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(cpu, be at 100)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(cpu, be at 100 time)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(cpu, be at 100 time)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(cpu, be at 100 time)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cpu, be at 100 time)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cpu, run at 100)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cpu, run at 100)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(cpu, run at 100)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(cpu, run at 100)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cpu, be at 100)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cpu, be at 100)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(cpu, be at 100)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(processor, run at 100)