crab: be at cold water

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shellfish
Weight: 0.67
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, predator
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
, crustacean
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hermit crab
Weight: 0.81
, hermit
Weight: 0.46
, lobster
Weight: 0.39
, shrimp
Weight: 0.38
, oyster
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cold water 1.00
be at water 0.88
be at salt water 0.81
be at pond of fresh water 0.80
be at boil water 0.78
be at salt water aquarium 0.78
be at shallow water 0.78
be at pot of boil water 0.76
be at briny water 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(lobster, be at pot of boil water)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(lobster, be at water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(lobster, be at water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lobster, be at water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(lobster, be at pot of boil water)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(lobster, be at pot of boil water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(crab, be at cold water)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(crab, be at water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(crab, be at boil water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(crab, be at briny water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at boil water)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at cold water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(crab, be at cold water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(lobster, be at water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at cold water)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(lobster, be at pot of boil water)