crab: be at galapagos

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shellfish
Weight: 0.67
, dish
Weight: 0.65
, predator
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
, crustacean
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hermit crab
Weight: 0.81
, hermit
Weight: 0.46
, lobster
Weight: 0.39
, shrimp
Weight: 0.38
, oyster
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at albera 1.00
be at crabtrap 1.00
be at resteraunt 1.00
be at crabpot 1.00
be at galapagos 1.00
be at ocena 1.00
be used to letching at 0.85
be at outside 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dish, be used to letching at) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(crab, be at galapagos)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(dish, be used to letching at)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dish, be used to letching at)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(dish, be used to letching at) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(crab, be at galapagos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(crab, be at galapagos)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at ocena)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(crab, be at ocena)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at crabtrap)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(crab, be at crabtrap)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(crab, be at resteraunt)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at resteraunt)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(crab, be at resteraunt)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(crab, be at crabtrap)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(crab, be at ocena)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crab, be at ocena)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crab, be at crabtrap)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(crab, be at outside)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(crab, be at resteraunt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at outside)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crab, be at outside)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(crab, be at outside)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at galapagos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(crab, be at galapagos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(dish, be used to letching at)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(crab, be at galapagos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(dish, be used to letching at)